Recently, I wrote about the per-36 numbers of this year’s rookie crop to try to figure out what we might see down the road from them if all goes well. Today, as we head into the All-Star Break, I thought it would be good to think more short term. Let’s see if this season’s per-36 (per-minute stats multiplied by 36) rankings can tell us a bit about who to target before fantasy trade deadlines. I’m looking specifically at players whose minutes can be expected to increase after the break that could be worthy of a roster spot (or at least a spot on your watch list). I’m going to use Basketball Monster’s per-36 player rater (8-category through 2/12) and pick out players, in order, who aren’t near the top of the overall rankings so that they’d come more cheaply or may even be unowned in your leagues. Now, remember that the order here is based on per-36 value, but many players down the list will likely play more minutes than many above them, so this isn’t the order in which we should value them. However, if you expect two players to play the same minutes, go with the higher ranked player. Also, very few of these guys will be sniffing 36 minutes per game, so don’t expect these numbers from any of them. They’re just to be used as a guide.

Want the best tools and projections to help dominate your league? Check out the Stocktonator, the byproduct of Rudy and machine making love. Click HERE for a FREE 3-day trial.

Rudy has been hard at work in the lab. His latest creation? DAILY LINEUPS PAGE. So good. So smooth. So helpful. He decided to go with the Sonny Bono red tint, while I prefer the blue tint. What say you?

  m/g p/36 3s/36 r/36 a/36 s/36 b/36 fg% ft%
Jordan Bell 14.4 12.8 0.0 9.7 4.5 1.7 2.7 66.4% 66.7%
John Collins 22.2 16.7 0.2 11.3 1.7 1.0 1.7 58.7% 73.2%
Deyonta Davis 12.7 14.3 0.0 10.0 1.4 0.7 2.0 62.7% 68.6%
Jarrett Allen 18.2 14.9 0.1 10.0 1.3 0.9 1.7 58.6% 77.9%
Bobby Portis 21.0 21.1 1.6 11.0 2.9 1.0 0.4 46.8% 81.9%
Julius Randle 24.2 21.4 0.2 10.9 3.3 0.7 0.9 55.7% 69.2%
Michael Beasley 20.4 22.7 0.7 9.4 2.4 0.8 1.0 51.1% 77.6%
Dejounte Murray 19.2 13.2 0.1 9.8 5.2 1.6 0.6 43.2% 71.0%
Bam Adebayo 20.7 12.9 0.0 9.4 2.9 1.0 1.2 54.9% 73.8%
Dwight Powell 19.6 14.1 0.4 9.4 1.6 1.5 0.7 59.9% 71.4%
D’Angelo Russell 23.7 23.6 2.0 5.7 6.7 1.1 0.3 42.2% 70.9%
Jabari Parker 17.8 18.7 0.5 5.1 1.5 1.5 1.0 48.0% 85.7%
D.J. Augustin 20.8 15.2 2.2 3.2 5.6 1.4 0.0 42.5% 85.5%
Emmanuel Mudiay 18.2 17.1 1.7 4.5 6.0 1.0 0.2 40.1% 79.1%
De’Aaron Fox 27.2 15.0 0.8 3.5 5.7 1.3 0.3 41.2% 73.0%
Frank Ntilikina 20.3 9.3 1.1 3.7 5.7 1.6 0.3 34.9% 70.2%
Cedi Osman 9.2 11.6 1.5 7.0 1.6 1.2 0.2 51.0% 55.6%
Josh Jackson 23.3 17.0 1.1 6.3 1.9 1.3 0.7 40.0% 60.7%

So, there are 18 guys I think might help us down the stretch by providing value due to a minutes increase, and those near the top make spectacular use of minutes. Take a look and see if any of these dudes might be available or cheap if they meet your needs. There are players every season that emerge and lead teams to fantasy titles. Maybe a couple of them are here. Enjoy Al-Star Weekend!

 

*After scoring 8 points in 9 seconds. Now, THAT’S some per-minute production.

 

This week’s classic fantasy line:

I looked for a recent surprising points per minute season. Check out Marreese Speights’ 2014-15 per-36 stats with the Warriors where he only played 15.9 minutes per game:

23.6 ppg/9.7 rbg/2.1 apg

 

  1. Shawn says:
    (link)

    Next year and beyond….D. Davis or S. Labissiere??

    • Tad

      Tad says:
      (link)

      @Shawn: @Shawn: That’s a tough one. I actually have them both stashed in dynasty. I’ll say Skal. I’m not certain he pans out, but he’s just over 2 years removed from the top of the incoming freshmen list with Ben Simmons. I have a hard time letting that stuff go (similarly, also stashing Giles). I think his ceiling/pedigree is better, whereas maybe Deyonta has a higher floor, but a likely chance of not doing better than being like an 8 pt, 7 reb, 1.5 block guy. Skal, while having ups and downs, has at least had some great NBA games.

      • Shawn says:
        (link)

        @Tad: Thanks for the response!!

Comments are closed.